Sometimes it is difficult in analyzing a map, but for this assignment it seemed like it was easy to understand through a few simple processes in Palladio and Google Fusion. For these visualizations, I wanted to see specifically where most of the photographs from the Cushman Collections were taken in California. The red dots are the geocoordinates of where the pictures were taken. In comparing the two maps from these different programs, they have some interesting qualities that makes them unique.
When I developed these visualizations, I simply loaded the Cushman edited spreadsheet into the sites, applied the geocoordinates and made them visible to view, and outlined the California borders in order for the viewer to see the coordinates within the state. The Palladio map shows the same geocoordinates as the Google Fusion map, but they are different from the layers that I offered for Palladio. However, Google Fusion map does not offer a lot of choices in changing the map’s background, unlike what Palladio did.
From looking over at these maps, they helped me understand how these pictures correlate with each other. In the spatial history reading from Zephyr Frank, he explains that spatial history teaches us the importance of space in offering us a historical outlook through visual analysis. Both visualizations show the spaces in between of where the photographs took place in; when analyzing them, they were mostly taken around the coastal, central, and southern areas of California.
Overall, they were quick and easy maps to create and they provided interesting information to me visually about the Cushman photographs in California.